• BBRC-Roofing-scaled.jpg
  • Ravenstone-advertising-1.jpg
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send Story Ideas & Tips
  • Contact
  • News Alerts
The Squamish Reporter

The Squamish Reporter

Follow us

Local News from Squamish and Sea to Sky Region

Wednesday May 21, 2025 Your gateway to the Sea to Sky corridor
  • Home
  • Squamish
  • Sea to Sky
  • BC/Canada
  • Life
  • Support Us
  • Woodfibre-LNG.jpg
  • SQ-RV-1.jpg

More Developers Want Permit Extensions

January 12, 2013 9:10pm
secondAVE-web
An artists rendering of a vacant second ave lot that has received a second development permit extension.

By Gagandeep Ghuman
Published: Jan. 12, 2013

Raj Nijjar bought into the Olympics hype in the way of a property on Victoria Street in downtown Squamish.

It was 2007, and Nijjar, a Vancouver developer, thought he could turn a neat profit with a 27-unit apartment on the second floor and 3,000 sq-ft of commercial space on the ground floor. 

Six months to get permits, he figured, and another 6-8 months to build the building.

Come 2009 and they would be hosting open houses. Well, it didn’t quite work that way.

Nijjar says he hit an uncalculated roadblock: Planning department at the district of Squamish.

To begin with, they wanted revisions and more revisions of how the building would look like.

They rejected the building designs, and asked the architects to come back with new ones.

Then, the developer was asked to hire an artist to do an art displays outside the building.

The art, they were told, had to be vetted by the arts council.

Time passed.

Frustrated by rejections, the architect gave up, the developer ended up suing the architect, and the arts council never did get time to approve those art displays.

More time passed.

Finally, three years after he first approached the district, Nijjar received the development permit in 2010.

The market had cooled by then.

“There was no proper process in place, it was very frustrating dealing with the bureaucracy in Squamish,” he says.

“The zoning was already in place and it should have taken them six months, not three years, to get us the development permit.”

Nijjar has now joined a growing number of developers who are asking the district to extend their development permits, their dreams of condos and commercial offices postponed.

Citing poor market conditions, Nijjar applied for a two-year extension on his property, now one of many blisters on downtown Squamish.

Another one can be found on Second Ave, and it will remain that way for some time.

Developer for that site, Kayvan Mazhari came before the council this January and asked for a two-year extension for the project, a 27-unit apartment and commercial space.

A proposed residential development project, Parkview, located at 1150, Bailey Street in downtown Squamish was also granted a one-year extension this October.

The latest in this string of extension requests comes from Solterra development for its three residential projects in downtown Squamish.

Solterra applied and got extension for The Falls and The Nature’s Gate, two condos and town-house complex projects that have been extended twice.

Mike Bosa of Solterra said the absorption rate in Squamish is very low, but is hopeful the town would attract more people from Lower Mainland who would like to live in Squamish.

 

 

Share

Share

[addtoany]

Four non-profits hosting screening of Pride vs Prejudice documentary

Residents voice concern about downtown encampment

Squamish looks to join pilot program to legalize e-scooters

https://www.squamishreporter.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Nesters-Sean-Jordan.jpg

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. EM says

    January 13, 2013 at 3:11 pm

    On the bright side, these developers would likely be bankrupt like Skye had they built in 2009.
    Notwithstanding, DOS’s Service Inititative should outline province-wide norms for DP applications, and specifically where DOS in the past has been deficient, untimely, or excessive in it conditions of approval / demands for zoning amenities… Let’s show that we understand HOW to be “open for business”, not just use it as another buzzword.

  2. moe says

    January 13, 2013 at 7:00 pm

    I am supportive of local governments having a list of qualified planners; developers and business’s could use in situations such as this. The proponent would receive a list to choose from. All of which would be up to date on the existing OCP, zoning , bylaws and neighbourhood plans. This would speed up process significantly, as well it would stop the bureaucrats from politicizing decisions and or process. Private sector peers would be able to identify when this was occurring as well the private planner would have an accountability to there client unlike the current system. Politicians through the voters set direction bureaucrats carry out the work. Too often bureaucrats try to set direction leaving politicians to put out the fires.

    Thanks for bringing this too light Gagan and Mr. Nijjar!

  3. namar says

    January 14, 2013 at 1:01 pm

    It is better for the developers to push there boundaries of luck
    than council

Primary Sidebar

  • Tara-Hunter-approved.jpg
  • Arta-Medical-ad-VERITICAL.jpg
  • BCMM-ad-VERTICAL.jpg

Footer

  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy
  • Terms & Conditions
Top Copyright ©2020 The Squamish Reporter. All Rights Reserved squamish reporter logo
 

Loading Comments...